MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '21 at 19:48
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 225 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 732 72% 588 Pts	64-Core 905 56% 905 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 5,957 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (85^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)	53.3% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 62.3 54% 65.1 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 67.1 Splatting 61.3 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 26GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 137 119 147 173 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 388 Write 183 Mixed 218 SusWrite 142 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 31.9 125% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 194 156% 223 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 83%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2512 Write 1,939 Mixed 1,605 447% 2,019 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 73.6 242% 81.7 MB/s	DQ Read 884 DQ Write 594 DQ Mixed 796 579% 758 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 220GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 361 367 367 369 370 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 356 Write 363 Mixed 269 SusWrite 367 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 26.5 86% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 132 100% 134 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 87%
Ambarell A9 DSC EVK Platf 64GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 42GB free, PID 4026 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 33.5 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 33.4 46% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 2.9 260% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.3% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 22.5 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 21.2 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 95.9 42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27F6 ASUS VE278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	430x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	208x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	185x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	99x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	76x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $602

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)