Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 22:27
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 152 2-Core 290 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 536 8-Core 981 91% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,573 97% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 498 450 226 147 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 887 Write 549 Mixed 647 SusWrite 334 135% 604 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 48.5 171% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 503 DQ Write 540 DQ Mixed 467 366% 503 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 144%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50 9,565 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 191GB free Firmware: O1026A SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 419 418 419 419 421 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 416 Mixed 324 SusWrite 419 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 41.1 145% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 200 171% 251 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 305GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 54 59 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 168 Write 77.5 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 57.7 60% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 107%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 117 Write 117 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 101 142% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 49%
WD Elements 2620 4TB 3,758 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 88 88 87 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 82.8 Write 89.2 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 88.1 111% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.7 157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 64%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 209GB free, PID 0370 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 35.8 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 39.1 47% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 343GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 102 103 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 102 124% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.4 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 23.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 45: 9R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	33%	27	231	58	144	31.5"	2560 1440	AOC3201 Q32G1WG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,619x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,482x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,144x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	684x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	483x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	383x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $806

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16