Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 860
84% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 126
Parallax 85.8
77% 102 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 73.1
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 438
Mixed 417
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 6.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
25% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
15GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 136 142 146 140 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 142
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 123 121 120 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61% Good
Read 93.3
Write 90.9
Mixed 82
SusWrite 119
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 30.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 30.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 5R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 21% 95 289 255 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
History: Score 37: 4R 3G 8B | Score 50: 5R 5G 10B
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $441
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback