MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 17:59
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 290
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 812
81% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 37.7
22% 34.3 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 26.5
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso PCIe 480GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 373 413 430 414 437 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 468
Mixed 410
SusWrite 452
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 35.2
129% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 377
316% 462 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 230%
Generic Externa 500GB
377GB free
Firmware: 0056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 38 40 41 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 10.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 40.6
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 26.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 17" 1280 720 PHL082F Philips 190S
Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback