Asus P8Z68-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '17 at 18:08
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 101 2-Core 195 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 475 51% 405 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% PowerColor(148C 2373) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.6% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 61.9 Parallax 60.9 37% 55.9 fps	MRender 59.6 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 51.1 42% 51.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN9480GESG 480GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2007 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 394 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C2) HDA temperature 65 45 236223725603	66.8% Good	Read 372 Write 372 Mixed 369 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 13.6 68% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 61.3 84% 156 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 99%
Intel X25-M 40GB 1,808 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 16GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7000 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3463 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 309 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 85992 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 9459458 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 816010112 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	28.7% Poor	Read 185 Write 42 Mixed 68.7 21% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 6.67 52% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 41.6 DQ Mixed 44.6 45% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 36%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 859GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 93 (03) Spinup time 120 120 25790579003 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5401 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 130 130 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9454 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3889 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5443 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5443 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 231928692778 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	71.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 124 Mixed 129 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.41 93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 298GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 160 6525 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6981 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7978 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3376 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 327 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 89086 (C2) HDA temperature 110 95 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 15 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	38% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 70.2 Mixed 66.8 50% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.15 61% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-M PRO Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-M PRO

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	66x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	62x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	28x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	15x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	14x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $531

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369