Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '21 at 18:04
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.65 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 53.3 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 53.1 29% 42.9 Pts	4-Core 30.3 8-Core 111 8% 70.4 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3648 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39% Below average	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 31 Parallax 56.7 18% 36.7 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 102 Splatting 65.7 79% 102 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 8.2 11 11 99 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 315 Write 199 Mixed 193 SusWrite 26.8 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 7.6 24% 7.97 MB/s	DQ Read 85 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 29.3 36% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 106%
Intel Optane+2.7TBHDD 16 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2.5TB free Firmware: 16.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 84 74 56 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 407 Write 109 Mixed 156 SusWrite 76.1 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 11.5 44% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 74.3 DQ Mixed 87.5 67% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 45%
VectoTech 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 196 181 169 112 175 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 49.1 Write 171 Mixed 250 SusWrite 169 37% 160 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 11.8 30% 9.63 MB/s	DQ Read 61.9 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 70.9 51% 65 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 64%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 6TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 150 151 121 88 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 156 Write 167 Mixed 127 SusWrite 128 195% 144 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.7 210% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 103%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 670GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 80 60 52 67 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 80.3 Write 80.2 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 66.3 91% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 10,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	961x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	285x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16