Biostar B560MX-E PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar B560MX-E PRO  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210608
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 16:19
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$112
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 802
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Zotac(19DA 3378) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 28.8
25% 31.8 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 26.9
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 480GB 480GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 321 44 12 92 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 457
Write 374
Mixed 328
SusWrite 81.9
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 0.7
40% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
15% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
413GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 121 134 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 132
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
299GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 129
Write 114
Mixed 83
SusWrite 97.3
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$62
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560MX-E PRO Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar B560MX-E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback