Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 680
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 77
58% 74.6 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 68.3
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 19 20 23 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 4,191
Write 40.6
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 23.5
225% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 343
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 5.2
527% 117 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 309%
Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
403GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 129 104 134 114 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 501
Write 419
Mixed 408
SusWrite 127
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 23.6
98% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 95.2
102% 178 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 125%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 85 103 104 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 90.4
Write 92.7
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 102
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
458GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 0 12 16 16 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
59GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 24 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 35
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 27.2
41% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 43%
Generic MassStorageClass 253GB
161GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 4.3 3.7 5.1 4.3 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 16.4
Mixed 22
SusWrite 4.5
24% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.3
210% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Slice 8GB
7GB free, PID 5566
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.9 3.6 4.1 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 17.2
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.7
8% 7.28 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.4
178% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 18.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback