Intel B85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel B85  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 270
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox SD250-256GN 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0830A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 44 34 39 27 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 343
Write 55.2
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 36.1
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 10
66% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 22.5
20% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MG8JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85 Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel B85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback