Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '21 at 23:31
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 212 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 369 48% 363 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 8A93) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.4% Average	Lighting 50.6 Reflection 55.6 Parallax 71.6 41% 59.3 fps	MRender 57.4 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 42.6 42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB 5,487 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231800WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 224 225 218 226 227 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,124 Write 1,151 Mixed 969 SusWrite 298 198% 885 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 48.4 176% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 915 DQ Write 494 DQ Mixed 587 468% 665 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 226%
SSD 512GB 512GB 6,819 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 318GB free Firmware: FW200828 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 329 326 328 327 332 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 418 Write 359 Mixed 317 SusWrite 320 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 10.4 93% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 18.6 69% 151 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 211%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 612GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 150 150 150 151 150 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 142 Write 136 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 149 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Asgard VMA42UG-MEC1U2AW1 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G VMA42UG-MEC1U2AW1 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.3% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.7 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 13.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16