Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 213% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 203% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	224% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	47 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration	592 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 143 2-Core 288 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 545 8-Core 1,057 95% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,087 67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$785 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% EVGA(3842 3998) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Lighting 336 Reflection 297 Parallax 334 274% 322 fps	MRender 372 Gravity 261 Splatting 191 215% 275 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 960 1055 806 681 574 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,327 Write 1,128 Mixed 1,122 SusWrite 845 248% 1,105 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 70.9 235% 79.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,386 DQ Write 999 DQ Mixed 1,139 866% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 132GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,508 Write 2,262 Mixed 1,513 465% 2,094 MB/s	4K Read 59.4 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 72.5 244% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,357 DQ Write 997 DQ Mixed 1,216 898% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WDC WD8001FZBX-00ASYA0 8TB 1,209 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 238 227 233 238 230 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 228 Write 240 Mixed 114 SusWrite 233 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 1.7 9% 4.03 MB/s	DQ Read 3.6 DQ Write 8.3 DQ Mixed 6.6 5% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 28%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1.5TB free Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2206 2195 2197 2205 2199 2194 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	365% Outstanding	Read 2,447 Write 2265 Mixed 2,176 SusWrite 2,199 512% 2,272 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 81 258% 86.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,354 DQ Write 990 DQ Mixed 1,124 853% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 365% Great: 526%
DAS TerraMaster 5TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 191 196 191 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 181 Write 184 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 193 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 35% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 17%
DAS TerraMaster 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 13TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 131 133 131 132 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 15% Great: 72%
DAS TerraMaster 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 13TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 135 134 132 133 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 15% Great: 72%
DAS TerraMaster 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 191 193 201 214 209 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 15% Great: 72%
DAS TerraMaster 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 6TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 173 178 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 15% Great: 72%
WDC WD140EDGZ-11B2DA 14TB 13TB free, PID 0576 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 66 66 66 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.3% Very good	Read 186 Write 184 Mixed 108 SusWrite 66.1 175% 136 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 1.8 395% 4.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1.9 DQ Write 9.6 DQ Mixed 2.1 405% 4.53 MB/s

WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3TB free, PID 0576 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 22 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.2% Above average	Read 184 Write 182 Mixed 149 SusWrite 22.5 173% 134 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 2.1 323% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 84%
WDC WD100EMAZ-00WJTA 10TB 2TB free, PID 0576 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 22 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.7% Above average	Read 156 Write 162 Mixed 112 SusWrite 22.4 145% 113 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.9 346% 4.37 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 5.8 DQ Mixed 1.3 243% 2.53 MB/s

WDC WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 219GB free, PID 0576 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 130 136 135 133 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.2% Good	Read 151 Write 158 Mixed 107 SusWrite 133 185% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1 228% 2.77 MB/s

WDC WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 1.5TB free, PID 0576 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 22 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39% Below average	Read 127 Write 139 Mixed 98 SusWrite 22.4 125% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 2.53 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 18,655 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 33.8 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 41.7 SC Mixed 30.2 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,881x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,615x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,307x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	651x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	642x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	859x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	489x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	280x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16