Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '21 at 06:58
Run Duration	389 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 86.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 243 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 768 77% 624 Pts	64-Core 979 61% 979 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 867E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.6% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 106 Parallax 125 102% 119 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 123 Splatting 0.1 71% 99.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$80 8,191 User benchmarks, average bench 229% 152GB free Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1028 546 972 908 1112 252 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,364 Write 800 Mixed 1,064 SusWrite 803 225% 1,008 MB/s	4K Read 61 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 79.5 261% 88.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,096 DQ Write 720 DQ Mixed 1,027 734% 948 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 308%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668 2,601 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 846GB free Firmware: R0427A SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 472 475 474 475 476 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 470 Mixed 409 SusWrite 474 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 50.9 169% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 309 250% 354 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 127%
SABRENT 1TB 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1218 970 613 788 784 756 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB 769 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 121 114 120 124 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 407GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 133 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 132 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 588GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 145 146 145 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 159 Write 144 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 145 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 109%
DAS TerraMaster 12TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 43GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 32.7 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 21 24% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.1 508% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 128%
DAS TerraMaster 10TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 33.3 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 21.4 22% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1.4 266% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 105%
DAS TerraMaster 12TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 33.1 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 14.1 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2.6 460% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 128%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 885GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 32.6 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 14 22% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 2 353% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 102%
DAS TerraMaster 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.2% Very poor	Read 36.9 Write 32.1 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 14 22% 29 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2.7 500% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 72%
WD WD40EMRX-82UZ0N0 4TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 161 163 165 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 94.4 Write 99.4 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 163 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 102%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 90 91 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 115 Write 99 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 90.3 125% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.7 313% 3.33 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 8.4 DQ Mixed 0.6 308% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 63%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 84 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 93.3 Write 85.3 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 83.6 109% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.7 236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.7 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 34.7 115% 40.4 GB/s	SC Read 28 SC Write 37.4 SC Mixed 29.7 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $91Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $751

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)