Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '22 at 18:18
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 81.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 286 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 870 86% 700 Pts	64-Core 1,122 69% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2277 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 118 Parallax 107 86% 110 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 105 Splatting 106 87% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB 18,999 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 253 254 262 245 246 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,197 Write 1270 Mixed 1,087 SusWrite 337 218% 973 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 68.7 238% 88.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,075 DQ Write 931 DQ Mixed 1,027 763% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 213%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 6GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 218 Write 124 Mixed 186 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 34.2 129% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 93.9 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 102 79% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 97 97 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 104 Write 65.2 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 96.5 62% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 114%
USB2.0 DISK 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID ef18 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 11 8.2 11 8.2 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.43% Terrible	Read 22.9 Write 3.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 9.5 12% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.43% Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 103 Write 17 Mixed 23 SusWrite 12.2 38% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.7 126% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 30%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 65 65 61 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 250 Write 67.4 Mixed 107 SusWrite 62.4 136% 122 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 12.6 1,120% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.9 DQ Write 20.3 DQ Mixed 14.1 1,240% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 30%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 55GB free, PID 1666, DataTraveler Kyson Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 17 40 18 43 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 106 Write 44.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 28.2 50% 47 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 12.4 1,010% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 19.5 DQ Mixed 13.8 1,203% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 36 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 37 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $194

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,309x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	838x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,034

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16