Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '22 at 11:34
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 116 56% 90 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 422 41% 338 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.4% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 72.4 Parallax 99.9 56% 80.2 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 44.7 46% 57.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 637 577 598 605 593 552 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 804 Write 944 Mixed 918 SusWrite 594 184% 815 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 66 4K Mixed 47.2 158% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 317 231% 301 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 340%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 510GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 387GB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 127 111 116 124 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 730 Write 696 Mixed 427 SusWrite 127 110% 495 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 30.6 106% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 94.7 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 83.7 72% 104 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 139%
AMD 2+1 Disk RAID5 4TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 756GB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.7 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 99.7 Write 9.8 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 9.7 24% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 174%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.4% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 18.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 13.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	29x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 66%, 6,389 samples	22x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	20x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $625

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16