Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 01:37
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 69.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 260
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 792
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 1021
63% 1021 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 86AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 109
Parallax 123
94% 116 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.4
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,100
Write 1,736
Mixed 907
349% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 52.8
200% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 557
480% 694 MB/s
Poor: 185% Great: 373%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
144GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1268 1146 973 824 727 668 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,733
Write 1,368
Mixed 754
SusWrite 934
267% 1,197 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 56.2
198% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,222
DQ Mixed 1,077
868% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 245%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
209GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 364 417 426 415 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 443
Mixed 360
SusWrite 404
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 39.6
144% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 189
145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 60 27 49 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 39
69% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 26.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $934
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback