Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 13:26
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 254
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 892
84% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,441
89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 142
116% 142 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 143
116% 142 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 113%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1653 1593 1588 1563 1618 1594 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 1,790
Mixed 1,683
SusWrite 1,602
386% 1,713 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 51.8
181% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 268
291% 516 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 253%
Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
126GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 707 674 672 670 627 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,477
Write 1,193
Mixed 1,548
SusWrite 728
330% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 46.3
183% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 238
283% 524 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 229%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
362GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 395 394 388 390 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 408
Write 329
Mixed 244
SusWrite 393
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 19
74% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 95.5
DQ Mixed 163
120% 160 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 104%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$91
11GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 349
Mixed 50
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 17.3
72% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 159
115% 153 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
52GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 99 97 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 96.9
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB
567GB free
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 41 40 34 36 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 48
Write 38.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 37.2
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 62%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 115 109 113 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 76
SusWrite 114
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
265% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 27.2
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 27
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback