Besstar UM700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBesstar UM700  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM700
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 140
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 492
47% 387 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 18.7
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 8.7
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 307 312 328 328 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 973
Write 322
Mixed 407
SusWrite 305
110% 502 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 35.5
152% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 386
299% 414 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 215%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
498GB free
Firmware: A905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 89 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 78
Write 72.1
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 88.8
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM700 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback