Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 12:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 970 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 137
48% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 224
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 12.9
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 145 144 145 142 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 401
Write 150
Mixed 174
SusWrite 142
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 27.2
97% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 112
112% 183 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 81%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
538GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 89 89 89 83 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50% Average
Read 88.2
Write 39.2
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 85.8
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R744G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback