| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190515 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 29 '22 at 16:31 |
| Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
86% 155 Pts
|
75% 601 Pts
|
43% 691 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86.5%
Excellent
|
88% 103 fps
|
84% 106 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 18 16 4.7 3.7 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
26% 116 MB/s
|
73% 24.8 MB/s
|
142% 255 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
418GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 158 160 162 161 160 MB/s
|
81.7%
Excellent
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
218% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.4%
Average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
58% 69.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,394 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,205x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 512x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 487x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 297x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 276x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 237x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $554 |