MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200917
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 08:56
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 589
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
PNY(196E 1332) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 2315 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 128
Parallax 80
77% 101 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 72.5
60% 73.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 829 798 792 911 678 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,560
Write 1,511
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 889
299% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 41.1
139% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 586
439% 590 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 186%
Great: 334%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
355GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 277 130 101 101 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 382
Write 154
Mixed 332
SusWrite 177
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 35.9
124% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 360
268% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 128%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
471GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 335 356 370 389 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 440
Write 398
Mixed 349
SusWrite 344
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 27.1
101% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 278
229% 328 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
682GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 124 133 98 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 149
Write 138
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 122
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 101%
WDC WD10 SPZX-60Z10T0 1TB
834GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 113 116 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 78
SusWrite 115
145% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
186% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
201GB free, PID null, Ultra Fit
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 15 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 16.9
Mixed 23
SusWrite 14
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
108% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 31 33 31 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 83
Write 65.4
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 32.1
68% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 32.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 6,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback