Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 14:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 970 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 138
56% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 226
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 10.4
8% 9.77 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 7.3
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 219 217 251 242 234 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 400
Write 266
Mixed 248
SusWrite 226
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 30.5
116% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 253
196% 269 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback