Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 04:15
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 338
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 31.8
26% 32.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 23
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
32GB free
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 125 125 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 466
Write 419
Mixed 388
SusWrite 121
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 38
140% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 124
111% 171 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 156 151 145 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 172
Write 162
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 130
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
66GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 26 35 42 33 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 134
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 34.2
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.9
273% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 0820 500GB
8GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 15
SusWrite 22.9
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback