Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory11.8 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 03:42
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 152
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 416
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 51.8
Parallax 75.9
47% 62 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 41.5
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0114A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 111 127 129 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 126
SusWrite 114
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 5.7
21% 6.6 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 32.2
46% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 50GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback