Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 20:28
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 41.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
70% 138 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 519
60% 464 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 87.2
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 36.7
71% 68.9 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 27.9
Splatting 20.4
37% 50.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 43 16 4.3 4.4 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 300
Write 230
Mixed 217
SusWrite 53.1
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 7.8
29% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 78.8
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 9.9
24% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 52%
Kodak X150 240GB
197GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 266 65 65 64 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 326
Write 249
Mixed 263
SusWrite 138
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 13.8
52% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 187
169% 255 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 98 94 125 146 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 116
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 G.SKILL F4-2666C19-8GNT 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $241
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback