Today's hottest deals

Viglen DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemViglen DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$60
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 133
51% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 217
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2008) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 423 440 434 434 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 368
Write 406
Mixed 319
SusWrite 421
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 27.7
98% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 168
153% 230 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Viglen DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback