Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 21:54
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 175
2-Core 344
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1,080
105% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
EVGA(3842 4865) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 244
Parallax 279
220% 264 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 234
Splatting 175
193% 245 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 189%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 39 31 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 657
Write 603
Mixed 505
SusWrite 36.7
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 25.2
115% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 66.7
116% 221 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 113%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
119GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 106 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 1582
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 221
242% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 78.9
277% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 273
345% 604 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 191%
Great: 255%
SABRENT 1TB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,420
Write 2,442
Mixed 1,603
1,365% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 76.3
13,766% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1,119
10,250% 1,117 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
617GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 98 100 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 52.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 97.3
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 37.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 32.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 40.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback