Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-B  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ZBWAA
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140502
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 03:19
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2830
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 44.8
1-Core 8.5
2-Core 10
18% 21.1 Pts
4-Core 19.6
8-Core 7.5
2% 13.6 Pts
64-Core 26.4
2% 26.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F910) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.9
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 24 27 24 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 19.8
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 25.8
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-SD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.5
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback