Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant ML30 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML30 Gen9  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant ML30 Gen9
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 131
57% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 200
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 14 19 22 19 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 15.5
Write 35.6
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 20.3
15% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 68%
MB1000GDUNU 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 6.2 7.9 8.3 8.5 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
373GB free
Firmware: K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 4.8 6 6.9 6.9 8.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 862689-091 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML30 Gen9 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML30 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback