MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 21:24
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 998
89% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 168
Parallax 163
150% 172 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,805
Write 5,502
Mixed 6,431
1,462% 6,579 MB/s
4K Read 347
4K Write 282
4K Mixed 300
1,059% 310 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 901
680% 917 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 464 462 471 467 460 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 482
Mixed 395
SusWrite 467
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 48.7
166% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 255
217% 320 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 116%
Great: 117%
SABRENT 250GB
129GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 378 295 70 103 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 407
Write 369
Mixed 328
SusWrite 216
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 18.7
81% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 30.6
56% 107 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 82%
Teaml5li te3D120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 38 45 28 38 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 509
Write 300
Mixed 178
SusWrite 50.1
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 8.3
60% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 85.7
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 12.7
19% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB
456GB free
Firmware: MPAOA5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 65 63 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 85
Write 84.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 64
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
120GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 126 128 127 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 140
Write 126
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 127
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GVGB CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 33.8
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 29.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $543
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback