Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 04:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$163
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 195
59% 112 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 501
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 868A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 49
Parallax 43.3
37% 46 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 67.5
54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 43%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
203GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 265 82 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 343
Write 354
Mixed 309
SusWrite 153
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 18.9
66% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 57 75 77 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 65.5
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FBD2 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FBD2 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback