Intel NUC11TNBv5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11TNHv5
MotherboardIntel NUC11TNBv5  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 13:23
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1145G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 60.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 246
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 604
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 20.9
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 13.6
14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
476GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1163 1211 1247 1106 1197 576 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,703
Write 1,549
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 1,083
322% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 31.5
150% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 456
314% 396 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 195%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$191
267GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 391 399 403 415 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 407
Mixed 410
SusWrite 391
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 38.9
128% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 333
250% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 136%
External USB3.0 DISK04 12TB
556GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 52.6
Write 33.1
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 8.1
35% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.9
150% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 108%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
259GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 51.9
Write 33.3
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 8.1
37% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 93%
External USB3.0 DISK03 12TB
133GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 34.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 8.1
38% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.3
160% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 98%
External USB3.0 DISK00 12TB
211GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 33.9
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 8.1
38% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
119% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 71%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
15GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 32.6
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 8.1
38% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 2
190% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 20.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 6.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 3R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 27% 11 69 22 120 27" 2048 1152 GBT2716 G27QC A
Typical NUC11TNBv5 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11TNBv5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback