Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 221 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 359 46% 347 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 89.4 Parallax 53.1 50% 67.9 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 63.4 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 305 289 307 308 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 665 Write 600 Mixed 573 SusWrite 299 120% 534 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 45.7 146% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 716 DQ Write 393 DQ Mixed 510 391% 540 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$300 1,824 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 717GB free Firmware: M3CR045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 136 147 143 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 335 Write 413 Mixed 344 SusWrite 139 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 34.5 116% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 139 150% 251 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 91 92 99 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 81.4 Write 111 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 93.4 65% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 794GB free Firmware: 1AJ10006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 124 122 131 133 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 47.9 Mixed 73 SusWrite 123 67% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 23.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 23.6 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	48	60	24"	1920 1017	SAM07D6 SA300/350/360

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	192x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	181x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	128x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	62x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16