Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 97.5
39% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 202
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.83 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.9
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Masonsemi SSD 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0816A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 710 736 742 782 652 624 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 773
Mixed 693
SusWrite 708
175% 781 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 17.8
102% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 397
296% 396 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 129%
Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4S16G32C22ST 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 11 60 23.6" 1280 720 HKC2451 24N5C
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback