Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 211% UFO	Desktop 114% UFO	Workstation 243% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI (all builds)
Memory	50 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211022
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration	444 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$310 15,291 User benchmarks, average bench 117% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Memory 74.7 1-Core 205 2-Core 407 118% 229 Pts	4-Core 810 8-Core 1,465 137% 1,137 Pts	64-Core 2,610 162% 2,610 Pts
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 4881) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	189% Outstanding	Lighting 273 Reflection 256 Parallax 283 222% 271 fps	MRender 321 Gravity 230 Splatting 174 190% 242 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3211 1608 1611 1643 1646 1652 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	401% Outstanding	Read 2,771 Write 3,120 Mixed 2,853 SusWrite 1,895 600% 2,660 MB/s	4K Read 74 4K Write 201 4K Mixed 112 362% 129 MB/s	DQ Read 1,523 DQ Write 1,234 DQ Mixed 1,382 1,034% 1,380 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 401% Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 122GB free Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,473 Write 2,506 Mixed 2,369 548% 2,449 MB/s	4K Read 71.6 4K Write 196 4K Mixed 107 349% 125 MB/s	DQ Read 1,713 DQ Write 1,363 DQ Mixed 1,526 1,145% 1,534 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293 8,674 User benchmarks, average bench 534% 1.5TB free Firmware: 624331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 4510 4507 4031 2527 1505 1856 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	529% Outstanding	Read 3,866 Write 4212 Mixed 3,118 SusWrite 3,156 808% 3,588 MB/s	4K Read 63.5 4K Write 206 4K Mixed 87.2 317% 119 MB/s	DQ Read 2,082 DQ Write 1,722 DQ Mixed 1908 1,427% 1,904 MB/s
Poor: 292% ↑ This bench: 529% Great: 682%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$39 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 21GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 69 70 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 66.2 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 69.4 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 83%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 194GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 131 132 129 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 83% Great: 139%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 153GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 115 112 116 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 44.8 Write 80.4 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 114 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.4 180% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 90%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 88 91 87 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 65.7 Write 87.3 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 89.3 52% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 104%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB 375 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 78GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 117 121 121 124 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 116 Write 121 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 121 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 1.7 378% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 136%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 882GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 111 113 116 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 100 Write 104 Mixed 68 SusWrite 113 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.9 340% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 136%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 31GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.07% Terrible	Read 21.9 Write 32.9 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 4.5 30% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 70% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.07% Great: 14%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 659GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 37 37 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	Read 53.2 Write 36.3 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 36 50% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 69% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 20%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 68GB free, PID 25ff Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 55.8 Write 70 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 49.6 79% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.8 187% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 2x31.5GB 880 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	138% Outstanding	MC Read 54.1 MC Write 56.2 MC Mixed 50 153% 53.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 45.4 SC Mixed 28.9 89% 31 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 168%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 0P 4R 10G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	218	60	60	84.6"	1280 720	SAM0FEE SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 232%

UFO

Desktop 116%

UFO

Workstation 273%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

CPU
Core i9-12900KIntel $277Bench 117%, 66,991 samples	1,865x
Core i7-12700KIntel $215Bench 114%, 78,749 samples	1,197x
Core i9-12900KFIntel $310Bench 117%, 15,291 samples	329x

GPU
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	856x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	659x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	545x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	631x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	244x

RAM
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples	376x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GBGBench 172%, 21,264 samples	225x
Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 2x16GBCorsairBench 155%, 8,648 samples	196x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,044

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16