Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 00:32
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 814
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
MSI(1462 8A93) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.4% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 80.9
50% 67.4 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 43.4
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG450E500G-G 500GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMB0.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 161 141 118 96 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 452
Mixed 218
SusWrite 139
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 91.6
290% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 290
344% 626 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 152%
Great: 406%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 184 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 165
Mixed 109
SusWrite 185
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 29
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 26.6
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1920 1017 ACR074D KG241Q S
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback