Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 01:29
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 827
82% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 136
Parallax 168
72% 131 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 91
Splatting 160
123% 150 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R00Z2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 445 446 448 439 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 451
Mixed 383
SusWrite 395
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 41.5
153% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 282
211% 274 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
689GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2540 2642 2646 2634 2585 2631 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3534 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 36.6
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 35.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 DEL41E7 DELL S2721HGF
Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 1,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback