Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 21:14
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 688
74% 586 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
87% 107 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 84.4
Splatting 77.6
76% 95.2 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 425 427 431 427 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 1,624
Mixed 991
SusWrite 508
233% 1,030 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.6
196% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 865
652% 880 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 171%
Great: 236%
Lexar NM790 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 1946 1940 1937 1955 2012 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,165
Write 2,225
Mixed 1,381
SusWrite 1,928
381% 1,675 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 73.7
243% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 916
724% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 287%
This bench: 287%
Great: 637%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
0GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.6
Write 14.5
Mixed 9.2
18% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 2R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 17% 52 214 57 60 27" 1920 1017 DEL41F7 DELL S2721HN
History: Score 27: 0P 3R 3G 3B | Score 30: 0P 2R 4G 8B
Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $152Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback