Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 03:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2715QE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 76
2-Core 148
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 364
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.47
3% 4.14 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.5% Poor
Read 212
Write 79.1
Mixed 133
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 3.47
38% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 3.88
13% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500514NS 500GB-$50
464GB free
Firmware: AV22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 75.1
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.51
132% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-025.A00LF 9905584-016.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback