Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507RE
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '24 at 17:17
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 155
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 495
45% 377 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1EAC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 46
Parallax 71.9
31% 52.1 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 24.1
23% 28 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,734
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,105
310% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 52
162% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 377
298% 412 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 38.8
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 4% 26 203 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback