Today's hottest deals

Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 09 '24 at 23:39
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66% Good
Memory 55.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 251
78% 147 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 669
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 66%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 101
78% 82.4 fps
Poor: 79% Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M390 500GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 243 277 271 239 326 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 924
Write 241
Mixed 934
SusWrite 277
132% 594 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 648
452% 585 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 139%
Great: 303%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
691GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 188 187 190 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 119
Mixed 76
SusWrite 188
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1527CC.002 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 44% 18 181 10 120 24.5" 1920 1009 SPT6437 Sceptre M25
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback