Real World Speed
Performance profile from 119,950 user samples
1,998 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 65% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 65% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 542
117,952 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% MSI(1462 3301)
Worst Bench: 71% Gigabyte(1458 3703)
Poor: 71% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
84 % -17% 98.2 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
354 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+15%
308 fps -15%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
119 fps -67% 199 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+67%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
254 fps -14% 289 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
168 fps -33% 224 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
399 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+11%
359 fps -11%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
128 fps -69% 216 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+69%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
277 fps -16% 320 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
181 fps -34% 243 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+34%
Market Share
Based on 4,067,424 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % -9,083% 5.51 % Insanely higher market share.
+9,083%
Value
Value For Money
59.3 % -59% 94.3 % Much better value.
+59%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
85 % -82% 155 % Hugely more popular.
+82%
Price
Price (score)
$618 -37% $390 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
24 Months -50% 12 Months Much more recent.
+50%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
255 fps -41% 359 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+41%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
159 fps -101% 319 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+101%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
232 fps -36% 316 fps Much better lighting effects.
+36%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
147 fps -95% 286 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+95%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $297AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $233Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback