Real World Speed
Performance profile from 119,415 user samples
84,530 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 50% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 50% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 592
34,885 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Asus(1043 04DD)
Worst Bench: 56% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 56% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
64 % 66.1 % +3%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps 258 fps +1%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
128 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+10%
164 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps 177 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+42%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
303 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+5%
288 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+10%
134 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
205 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+18%
174 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps 187 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.6 fps 57.4 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps 181 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+14%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.4 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+17%
47.2 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.9 fps 99.5 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.7 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+8%
70.2 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.2 fps +3% 52.5 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps 184 fps +1%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68.1 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+39%
49.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65 fps 65.9 fps +1%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+9%
115 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.5 fps 99 fps +5%
Market Share
Based on 9,754,658 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.94 % Hugely higher market share.
+141%
0.39 %
Value
Value For Money
76.5 % +2% 74.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
151 % Much more popular.
+51%
100 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
$304
Age
Newest
25 Months Much more recent.
+32%
37 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps +1% 213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+11%
165 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
180 fps 195 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+8%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback