Real World Speed
Performance profile from 69,643 user samples
48,156 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% MSI(1462 3415)
Worst Bench: 52% PwrHis(1787 A480) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 52% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 23rd / 542
21,487 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 57% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 57% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 21st / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.6 % -3% 68.5 % +3%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps -0% 253 fps +0%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+10%
125 fps -10%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+11%
162 fps -11%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps -41% 176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+41%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps +4% 287 fps -4%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
136 fps -9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
177 fps -15%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
134 fps -41% 189 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
164 fps -17% 192 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+17%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.9 fps -1% 101 fps +1%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57.9 fps +2% 56.7 fps -2%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps +3% 73.9 fps -3%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.9 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+10%
60.6 fps -10%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.3 fps -8% 102 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.2 fps -6% 58.3 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+6%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
197 fps -2% 201 fps +2%
Market Share
Based on 4,087,262 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.71 % Hugely higher market share.
+229%
0.52 % -229%
Value
Value For Money
47.5 % -63% 77.6 % Much better value.
+63%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % Much more popular.
+53%
90 % -53%
Price
Price (score)
$608 -50% $304 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+50%
24 Months -50%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps 0% 216 fps 0%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
184 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
171 fps -8%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps -7% 197 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
156 fps -8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $225AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback