Real World Speed
Performance profile from 100,256 user samples
69,001 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Asus(1043 04FB)
Worst Bench: 52% MSI(1462 3415)
Poor: 52% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 549
31,255 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.8 % -3% 66 % +3%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
251 fps -2% 256 fps +2%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+10%
126 fps -10%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+10%
163 fps -10%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps -42% 177 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+42%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps +5% 286 fps -5%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
133 fps -11%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+19%
172 fps -19%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
134 fps -40% 187 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps -18% 189 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+18%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.7 fps -2% 93.5 fps +2%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.2 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+16%
46.6 fps -16%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.7 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+8%
70 fps -8%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.6 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+8%
61 fps -8%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.2 fps -10% 102 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.9 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+6%
53.9 fps -6%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67.7 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+30%
51.9 fps -30%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps +2% 102 fps -2%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
196 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+9%
180 fps -9%
Market Share
Based on 6,229,687 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.22 % Hugely higher market share.
+184%
0.43 % -184%
Value
Value For Money
79.2 % Slightly better value.
+6%
74.7 % -6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
148 % Much more popular.
+57%
94 % -57%
Price
Price (score)
$265 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
$304 -13%
Age
Newest
18 Months Much more recent.
+40%
30 Months -40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
214 fps 0% 214 fps 0%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+10%
167 fps -10%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
182 fps -9% 198 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+9%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
157 fps -8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback