Real World Speed
Performance profile from 42,391 user samples
17,853 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% Asus(1043 0517)
Worst Bench: 55% MSI(1462 3418)
Poor: 55% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 550
24,538 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Sapphire(174B E285)
Worst Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B E283)
Poor: 52% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 550
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
69 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+11%
62.1 % -11%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
275 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+13%
244 fps -13%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
142 fps Faster multi rendering.
+20%
118 fps -20%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
198 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+29%
153 fps -29%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps -28% 167 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
316 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+14%
278 fps -14%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
129 fps -19%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
218 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
167 fps -31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps -32% 183 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
194 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+28%
152 fps -28%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+15%
87.8 fps -15%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.7 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+41%
41.5 fps -41%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
78.1 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+30%
60.3 fps -30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+40%
43 fps -40%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
107 fps +3% 104 fps -3%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
174 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+6%
164 fps -6%
Market Share
Based on 6,884,295 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+183%
0.3 % -183%
Value
Value For Money
94.1 % Much better value.
+60%
58.7 % -60%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % More popular.
+23%
81 % -23%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Much cheaper.
+42%
$399 -42%
Age
Newest
9 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
51 Months -82%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
230 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+11%
207 fps -11%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18%
162 fps -18%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
200 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+8%
185 fps -8%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
176 fps Better reflection handling.
+20%
147 fps -20%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2018 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $224AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback