Real World Speed
Performance profile from 29,553 user samples
13,460 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Gigabyte(1458 3722)
Worst Bench: 60% EVGA(3842 6162)
Poor: 60% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 535
16,093 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 40% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 535
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+39%
47.3 % -39%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+13%
173 fps -13%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+43%
104 fps -43%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
202 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+70%
119 fps -70%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
159 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+80%
88.2 fps -80%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
218 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+11%
196 fps -11%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
157 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+40%
112 fps -40%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
217 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+67%
130 fps -67%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+78%
95.7 fps -78%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
149 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+22%
122 fps -22%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62.8 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+12%
56.2 fps -12%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
204 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+11%
183 fps -11%
Market Share
Based on 3,193,688 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.4 % Hugely higher market share.
+180%
0.5 % -180%
Value
Value For Money
102 % Much better value.
+41%
72.3 % -41%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % -15% 84 % More popular.
+15%
Price
Price (score)
$190 +2% $194 -2%
Age
Newest
7 Months Much more recent.
+67%
21 Months -67%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+60%
143 fps -60%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
193 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+35%
143 fps -35%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
211 fps Much better lighting effects.
+60%
132 fps -60%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
180 fps Much better reflection handling.
+40%
129 fps -40%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $329AMD RX 480 $199Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $430SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $135SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback