Real World Speed
Performance profile from 60,627 user samples
6,778 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 45% MSI(1462 3800) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% MSI(1462 8D92)
Poor: 38% Great: 45%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 621
53,849 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 29% Gigabyte(1458 22BB)
Poor: 29% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 85th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
41.8 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
34.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
153 fps 173 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+13%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.2 fps 105 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
152 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
123 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
112 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+34%
83.4 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
171 fps 194 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+13%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
95.9 fps 108 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+13%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
160 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+23%
130 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32%
89.9 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+31%
66 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,801,009 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % Hugely higher market share.
+135%
0.23 %
Value
Value For Money
66 % Hugely better value.
+85%
35.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
114 % More popular.
+16%
98 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 Much cheaper.
+34%
$228
Age
Newest
5 Months Hugely more recent.
+90%
52 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
189 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+34%
141 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
147 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
136 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
174 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
129 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
140 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
129 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $135Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback