Real World Speed
Performance profile from 66,708 user samples
11,423 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 43% Zotac(19DA 1546)
Worst Bench: 39% EVGA(3842 1153) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 43%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 627
55,285 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 33% PwrHis(1787 2359) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 33% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
40.7 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
35 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
171 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
127 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.5 fps 105 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+12%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
152 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23%
124 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
188 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+33%
141 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
96 fps 109 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
160 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+23%
130 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
148 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+11%
133 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+38%
66 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
119 fps 132 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+10%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+47%
91 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,405,282 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.59 % Hugely higher market share.
+168%
0.22 %
Value
Value For Money
64.2 % +5% 61.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
124 % More popular.
+28%
97 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 $135 Slightly cheaper.
+10%
Age
Newest
7 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
54 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
147 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
137 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
171 fps 194 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
89.2 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
139 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
130 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
152 fps 175 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
112 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+34%
83.8 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback