| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190515 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 09 '20 at 22:54 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
83% 153 Pts
|
74% 594 Pts
|
44% 703 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Zotac(19DA 3543) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60.1%
Good
|
66% 64 fps
|
49% 61.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 346 339 345 340 344 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
77% 345 MB/s
|
116% 40.8 MB/s
|
216% 319 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
617GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 163 162 159 161 MB/s
|
88.4%
Excellent
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
149% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown D4H8GL32A8TS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
57%
Above average
|
60% 20.8 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
48% 83.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,979 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 658x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 205x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 170x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 131x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 114x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $504 |