Real World Speed
Performance profile from 115,983 user samples
50,716 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Asus(1043 049A)
Worst Bench: 34% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 34% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 81st / 617
65,267 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% PwrHis(1787 201C) 3GB
Worst Bench: 35% Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
Poor: 35% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 76th / 617
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
44.2 % 46.3 % +5%
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
173 fps 195 fps Slightly better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps Much faster multi rendering.
64.4 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps 146 fps Faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.2 fps 91.9 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps 223 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
70.9 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
130 fps 165 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.4 fps 102 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps 138 fps +4%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps Better Fortnite fps.
58 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
40 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
123 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
70 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51 fps +4% 49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
39 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 106 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
41 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
59 fps
Market Share
Based on 18,300,565 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % 0.3 % Higher market share.
Value For Money
73.7 % Slightly better value.
67.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % Slightly more popular.
85 %
Price (score)
$170 Cheaper.
49 Months More recent.
69 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
142 fps 161 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
137 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
92.8 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
123 fps 139 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps Much better reflection handling.
83.2 fps

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $222Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback