Real World Speed
Performance profile from 117,438 user samples
53,849 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 29% Gigabyte(1458 22BB)
Poor: 29% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 85th / 621
63,589 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 42% Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
Worst Bench: 30% PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
Poor: 30% Great: 42%
SPEED RANK: 80th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
34.4 % 37 % Slightly faster effective speed.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
173 fps 198 fps Slightly better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps Much faster multi rendering.
65.2 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps 149 fps Faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.4 fps 93.3 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps 223 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
108 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
71.2 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
130 fps 165 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.9 fps 103 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps 137 fps +3%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
60 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
42 fps Slightly Better GTAV fps.
40 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
131 fps Slightly Better LoL fps.
123 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
70 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51 fps +4% 49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
39 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 112 fps Better Minecraft fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 106 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51 fps Better WoW fps.
41 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps Slightly Better WoT fps.
58 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,887,652 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.22 % 0.29 % Much higher market share.
Value For Money
49.4 % Hugely better value.
17.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % More popular.
85 %
Price (score)
$165 Much cheaper.
52 Months More recent.
72 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps 162 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
136 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
94.2 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps 141 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps Much better reflection handling.
84.7 fps

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback