UserBenchmark: AMD RX 6950-XT vs 7900-XT

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

$900

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 11,502 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

5,274 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 214% PowerColor(148C 2420) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 183% XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 183% Great: 214%

SPEED RANK: 13^th / 715

6,228 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 249% Asus(1043 05ED) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 158% ASRock(1849 5308) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 158% Great: 249%

SPEED RANK: 8^th / 715


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		199 %			220 %	Faster effective speed. +11%


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	249 fps	277 fps	Better lighting effects. +11%
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	263 fps	395 fps	Much better reflection handling. +50%
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	410 fps	428 fps	+4%
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	215 fps	233 fps	Slightly faster NBody calculation. +8%


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	268 fps	324 fps	Better peak lighting effects. +21%
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	281 fps	465 fps	Much better peak reflection handling. +65%
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	450 fps	480 fps	Slightly faster peak multi rendering. +7%
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	234 fps	259 fps	Faster peak NBody calculation. +11%

Market Share

Based on 67,622,260 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)		0.06 %			0.11 %	Hugely higher market share. +83%
User Rating UBM User Rating		56 %	Slightly more popular. +8%		52 %


Age Newest	24+ Months	17 Months	More recent. +29%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	590 fps	666 fps	Better peak texture detail. +13%
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	367 fps	465 fps	Faster peak complex splatting. +27%
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	526 fps	593 fps	Better texture detail. +13%
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	336 fps	407 fps	Faster complex splatting. +21%

Whilst the drought in the GPU market continues, street prices for AMD cards are around 50% lower than comparable (based on headline average fps figures) Nvidia cards. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. The combined market share for all of AMD’s RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers (Steam stats) is just 2.12% whilst Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5.03%. AMD’s Neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins and ignore the losses. Experienced gamers know all too well that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. ^{[May '22 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. ^{[Dec '22 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback