Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 854,030 user samples
840,268 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 133% EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 109% Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 713
13,762 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% AMD(1002 081E)
Worst Bench: 91% AMD(1002 081E)
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
124 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
101 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
167 fps Better lighting effects.
+27%
131 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Much better reflection handling.
+70%
112 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps Faster multi rendering.
+27%
104 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
176 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+15%
153 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+31%
140 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
257 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+109%
123 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
141 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+31%
108 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
192 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+19%
161 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,743,784 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.25 % Insanely higher market share.
+12,400%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
124 % Hugely better value.
+335%
28.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % Much more popular.
+31%
59 %
Price
Price (score)
$237 Much cheaper.
+72%
$841
Age
Newest
92 Months 69 Months More recent.
+25%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
199 fps 230 fps Better peak texture detail.
+16%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+53%
85.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
175 fps 209 fps Better texture detail.
+19%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
84.1 fps

Hyped as the "Ultimate GeForce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 20% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). It also supersedes the prohibitively expensive Titan X Pascal, pushing it off poll position in performance rankings. The 1080 Ti is based on the Pascal architecture and features a slightly modified version of the same flagship GP102 silicon found in the Titan X Pascal. It has 11GB of the high bandwidth GDDR5X video memory (versus 12GB in the Titan X Pascal) and an impressive 11GB frame buffer. Like the Titan X Pascal, it features 12bn transistors and 3584 CUDA cores which can run at a boost clock speed of 1.582 GHz – 3% faster than the Titan X Pascal's 1.531 GHz. This increased speed is partially attributable to the 1080 Ti’s new dualFET power system which allows the chip to run at higher power and more efficiently than ever before. The release of the 1080 Ti comes ahead of the competition from AMD's Vega - rumored for release in Q2 2017. Vega is AMD's next generation graphics card (following on from Polaris 10) featuring their new HBM2 die which is alleged to have eight times the capacity of GDDR5 with half of the footprint. NVDIA's own next generation graphics cards (Volta) are in the pipeline for 2018. [Mar '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The widely anticipated (albeit currently not widely available) prosumer AMD Radeon VII is finally available. It features a next generation Vega 20 GPU which is based on a 7nm manufacturing process, compared to 14nm in the first generation flagship: the RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than the RX Vega 64 (3840 vs 4096) but clock speeds have been boosted up to 1800 MHz compared to 1546 MHz in the RX Vega 64, the net result is 13.8 TFLOPS single precision computations (versus 13.4 TFLOPS for the RX Vega 64). On the negative side, the Radeon VII is designed with three cooling fans which can get noisy and early software drivers are reported to be buggy. Whilst there is a modest 16% performance advantage over the RX Vega 64, initial benchmarks indicate that the Radeon VII has an effective speed which is 6% short of the similarly priced RTX 2080.  [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback