Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 371,708 user samples
357,946 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 174% Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 128% Asus(1043 8667)
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 713
13,762 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% AMD(1002 081E)
Worst Bench: 91% AMD(1002 081E)
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
156 % Much faster effective speed.
+54%
101 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
209 fps Much better lighting effects.
+60%
131 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+86%
112 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
257 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+147%
104 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
153 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
239 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+71%
140 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+150%
123 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
286 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+165%
108 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
240 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+49%
161 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,676,107 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.76 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
83.6 % Hugely better value.
+194%
28.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % More popular.
+24%
59 %
Price
Price (score)
$441 Much cheaper.
+48%
$841
Age
Newest
73 Months 69 Months Slightly more recent.
+5%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
268 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
230 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
184 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+115%
85.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
231 fps Better texture detail.
+11%
209 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+94%
84.1 fps

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The widely anticipated (albeit currently not widely available) prosumer AMD Radeon VII is finally available. It features a next generation Vega 20 GPU which is based on a 7nm manufacturing process, compared to 14nm in the first generation flagship: the RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than the RX Vega 64 (3840 vs 4096) but clock speeds have been boosted up to 1800 MHz compared to 1546 MHz in the RX Vega 64, the net result is 13.8 TFLOPS single precision computations (versus 13.4 TFLOPS for the RX Vega 64). On the negative side, the Radeon VII is designed with three cooling fans which can get noisy and early software drivers are reported to be buggy. Whilst there is a modest 16% performance advantage over the RX Vega 64, initial benchmarks indicate that the Radeon VII has an effective speed which is 6% short of the similarly priced RTX 2080.  [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback